PLAY · A-Level · AQA 7702

Take it apart.

X-ray the same message across spoken, written and electronic mode, rewrite a directive along the power and politeness axes, and drag a word's meaning through six centuries.

Language-levels x-ray

FIG. 01 · AO1 · MODE & METHOD
SPOKEN · STAFF BRIEFING

 

    Mode

    One message — the shop shuts early because the heating has failed — produced three ways.

    Language levels

    Toggle a level off and its annotations vanish. Filter down to one and you are doing exactly what Paper 1 Section A asks: one level at a time, integrated afterwards.

    Spoken–written continuum
    SpokenWritten
    Mode
    Spoken
    Features shown
    0

    Why this is worth marks. AO1 is applied across every component and it is not awarded for spotting features — it is awarded for integrating the levels with accurate terminology. Paper 1 Section A hands you unseen texts differing in audience, purpose, genre and mode; the students who score are the ones who can say why an agentless nominalisation appears on a shop door but never in the staff group chat. Filter to a single level, then say what it is doing.

    Power & politeness dial

    FIG. 02 · AO2 · SOCIOLECTS

     

    Manager → staff

    Same speech act every time: get the report finished tonight. Only the power relationship moves.

    Bald on record

    Brown & Levinson's four strategies, from doing nothing to protect face up to hinting so heavily you never ask at all.

    Power type
    Instrumental
    Face threat
    High
    Mood
    Imperative
    Mitigation
    None

    Why this is worth marks. Paper 2 Section A rewards AO2 — critical understanding of concepts and issues, not a list of theorists. Notice what the dial exposes: the subordinate can only reach the same act by climbing the politeness scale, because asymmetry is built into the discourse before anyone opens their mouth. That observation — power constrains which strategies are even available — is the evaluative move top-band essays make about instrumental power, face and mitigation.

    Semantic drift

    FIG. 03 · AO2 · LANGUAGE CHANGE
    1200

     

    Word
    1200

    Drag forward. The spelling barely moves; the meaning walks off entirely — which is the whole prescriptivist argument, and its refutation.

    Process
    Direction

    Why this is worth marks. Paper 2 asks you to explain change with the right process word — broadening, narrowing, amelioration, pejoration, metaphorical extension — and then to evaluate attitudes to it (AO2). Drag the slider on "nice" and the descriptivist case writes itself: every meaning a prescriptivist defends is itself the wreckage of an earlier meaning someone else defended. Use that in the diversity-and-change essay rather than listing examples.

    Six real questions

    LIVE FROM THE BANK · NO ACCOUNT
    Practise A-Level English Language → Read the lessons All subject labs